This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[138.231.136.39] said: 550 5.1.0 <root(a)nonagon.crans.org>:
Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table (in reply to
RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[138.231.136.39] said: 550 5.1.0 <root(a)nonagon.crans.org>:
Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table (in reply to
RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[138.231.136.39] said: 550 5.1.0 <root(a)nonagon.crans.org>:
Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table (in reply to
RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[2a0c:700:0:1:200:9ff:fe04:1901] said: 550 5.1.0
<root(a)nonagon.crans.org>: Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay
recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[2a0c:700:0:1:200:9ff:fe04:1901] said: 550 5.1.0
<root(a)nonagon.crans.org>: Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay
recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[2a0c:700:0:1:200:9ff:fe04:1901] said: 550 5.1.0
<root(a)nonagon.crans.org>: Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay
recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[138.231.136.39] said: 550 5.1.0 <root(a)nonagon.crans.org>:
Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table (in reply to
RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[138.231.136.39] said: 550 5.1.0 <root(a)nonagon.crans.org>:
Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table (in reply to
RCPT TO command)
This is the mail system at host nonagon.crans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<monitoring(a)federez.net> (expanded from <root>): host
smtp.crans.org[138.231.136.39] said: 550 5.1.0 <root(a)nonagon.crans.org>:
Sender address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table (in reply to
RCPT TO command)
rssh (2.3.4-5+deb9u1) stretch-security; urgency=high
scp and rsync command verification have been made stricter to try to
prevent ways of running arbitrary code on the server via ssh
configuration options. As a side effect, this will break scp -3 to an
account using rssh, and will disallow using rssh to run arbitrary scp
and rsync commands on the server. Only the server end of an scp or
rsync command should now be allowed.
THE CVS SUPPORT IN RSSH IS PROBABLY NOT SECURE, as is already documented
in the manual page. While no variation of this attack for cvs is
currently known, cvs has many options and commands and the small amount
of filtering rssh does is probably not sufficient. Use the cvs support
at your own risk.
The approach rssh takes to try to restrict commands is fragile,
regularly broken by new features in the commands it tries to wrap, and
probably has additional bugs. It is no longer supported upstream and
will likely be removed from future versions of Debian. Please consider
switching to another security approach.
-- Russ Allbery <rra(a)debian.org> Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:50:08 -0800